Pisum sativum vs Glycine max, a comparative review of nutritional, physicochemical, and sensory properties for food uses - Institut Agro Dijon Accéder directement au contenu
Article Dans Une Revue Trends in Food Science and Technology Année : 2020

Pisum sativum vs Glycine max, a comparative review of nutritional, physicochemical, and sensory properties for food uses

Résumé

Background; Current issues surrounding meat consumption and changes in eating habits have motivated the development of meat substitutes. Vegetable proteins, especially legume proteins, are of interest. Soybean is the most widely used legume crop for food, but due to some negative aspects, it may be relevant to develop soybean substitutes.Scope and approach; Pea is a possible alternative to soybean and the latter was thus compared with pea to determine if pea would be a good substitute. This review provides a brief insight into the similarities and differences between soybean and pea regarding composition and nutrition as well as physicochemical and sensory aspects impacting their food uses.Key findings and conclusions; As pea is less allergenic than soybean but has similar nutritional and functional properties, it could be a great alternative to soybean. Nevertheless, some particularities of the pea composition can lead to a stronger “beany” off-flavor and so a less acceptable product. In addition, the isoenzymes involved in the development of off-flavor are more varied in the pea. The pea off-flavor may thus be more complicated to control.
Fichier principal
Vignette du fichier
S0924224419308374.pdf (1.03 Mo) Télécharger le fichier
Origine : Fichiers produits par l'(les) auteur(s)

Dates et versions

hal-02433349 , version 1 (21-07-2022)

Licence

Paternité - Pas d'utilisation commerciale

Identifiants

Citer

Estelle Fischer, Rémy Cachon, Nathalie Cayot. Pisum sativum vs Glycine max, a comparative review of nutritional, physicochemical, and sensory properties for food uses. Trends in Food Science and Technology, 2020, 95, pp.196-204. ⟨10.1016/j.tifs.2019.11.021⟩. ⟨hal-02433349⟩
144 Consultations
180 Téléchargements

Altmetric

Partager

Gmail Facebook X LinkedIn More